Solar projects live or die by the quality of their engineering. Panels get the photo ops, but the electrical engineering is what determines how safely and efficiently your system performs, how smoothly your interconnection proceeds, and whether your projected returns show up on schedule. Choosing the right partner takes more than scanning a vendor list and comparing line items. It requires understanding how a solar electrical engineering company actually shapes risk, reliability, cost, and time across the entire project lifecycle.
What follows is a practical guide from the vantage point of projects that have gone to construction and stayed healthy through their first decade. I will point to what works, what often gets missed, and where a seasoned solar electrical engineer makes all the difference.
Begin with project clarity, then match expertise to scope
The best selection process starts with a candid definition of your project. A 300 kW rooftop for a food distributor in a dense urban district has a very different risk profile than a 25 MW ground mount feeding a rural cooperative. You do not need a complete design to start, but you do need to frame constraints and goals early.
At a minimum, have a clear sense of your site type and size, grid interconnection path, utility territory, structural or geotechnical unknowns, and any special circumstances. Historic district? Hazardous location classification? Battery storage integration? Generator and solar backfeed on a common bus? The sharper your initial brief, the easier it is to filter for the right solar electrical engineering services and avoid misalignment that will cost months later.
Experienced firms will ask questions that map to risk. If a solar electrical engineer PV solar engineer barely probes utility coordination or voltage drop on long feeder runs, that is a flag. If they immediately discuss arc flash boundaries, relay coordination, NEC 705 and 710 interplay for hybrid systems, and utility protection philosophies in your ISO, you are likely on the right street.
Licensing, stamps, and the meaning of accountability
In most jurisdictions, drawings that affect public safety must be stamped by a licensed Professional Engineer registered in the state where the project is built. Some states allow reciprocity or require firm authorization. Ask plainly who will be the Engineer of Record, what disciplines are in house, and whether the firm maintains multi-state licensure.
A solar electrical engineering company that operates nationally may rely on a network of local PEs. That can work well if communication is tight and the local engineer is engaged from schematic design, not parachuted in to rubber-stamp at the end. Stamping is not a clerical act. It is a legal and ethical responsibility. If your schedule depends on a fast AHJ review, the credibility of the stamp and the quality of the submission set the tone. Good engineers think about reviewers’ expectations, assemble coherent one-lines, and include coordination studies and calculations that preempt back-and-forth.
Track record matters, but ask for specifics
A portfolio full of glossy images tells you little. Ask for three projects that look like yours and dig into specifics. For a midsized rooftop in a mixed-use building, have they addressed rapid shutdown edge cases at property lines, fire service access, and pathways that satisfy local amendments? For carports, can they speak to bonding across moving joints in steelwork and managing stray currents that corrode anchor bolts? For utility-scale, have they closed out telemetry and SCADA handshakes on time with your balancing authority, and how did they handle anti-islanding settings changes during commissioning?
The details matter because they signal operational maturity. One EPC learned this the hard way after choosing a low-bid engineer for a 5 MW project. The drawings looked fine, but the relay settings did not match the utility’s revised protection philosophy after a substation upgrade. The result was four weeks of rework, a failed witness test, and a missed PPA deadline. A senior engineer could have caught the change in a single call with the utility protection group.
Codes, standards, and the reality of interpretation
Solar codes are not static. NEC Articles 690, 705, 706, and 710 are where much of the action is for PV, interconnections, and energy storage. Layer in UL 3741 for PV hazard control systems, UL 1741 SB for inverters, IEEE 1547-2018 for interconnection requirements, and utility-specific specs that can overrule default inverter settings, and you have a lot of moving parts. Then add local amendments. Some AHJs still expect clear 3-foot rooftop perimeter pathways even when the array is inset, while others have nuanced interpretations of rapid shutdown distance zones.
A competent solar electrical engineer knows the code text, but more importantly, knows where interpretation is likely to drift. Look for submittals that anticipate reviewer questions. Good packages include labeled points of connection, conductor ampacity with derating assumptions spelled out, bonding and grounding details that travel from module frame to main service, and short-circuit and arc flash studies that match as-built equipment ratings. If you are integrating storage, you want familiarity with NFPA 855 and IFC energy storage chapters, along with battery management system integration nuances that affect emergency shutoff and signage.
Utility coordination is a discipline, not an afterthought
Interconnection is where many projects lose months. Getting on the queue is just the beginning. A seasoned firm maintains a relationship with utility planners and protection engineers. They know how to present one-lines that match the utility’s templates, how to respond to feeder modeling requests, and how to translate inverter ride-through and Volt/VAR behavior into settings that the utility will approve.
This coordination also touches civil and site design. If the utility insists on a visible open, lockable disconnect within line of sight of the meter, and your layout pushes it behind a fence, expect delays. On larger projects, the generator step-up transformer impedance, grounding method, and high-side protection must align with utility protection schemes. I have seen projects repeat witness tests because the inverter team and the relay technician used different time bases and setpoints. The fix was simple coordination up front, but that required a firm that treats utility communication as a core service, not a handoff.
Design depth and how it links to procurement
There is a temptation to push fast schematic packages to unlock procurement and then figure out the rest later. That strategy backfires when feeder sizes, conduit fill, or equipment footprints shift and clash with purchase orders. A rigorous solar electrical engineering company will not overdesign blindly, but they will front-load enough detail to protect your long-lead purchases. That often means locking conductor materials and sizes based on thermal modeling, agreeing on inverter skid connection geometry, and reserving space for utility-required equipment even if that submittal will arrive later.
On rooftops, this plays out in the raceway plan and rooftop penetration strategy. On carports, conduit routing within the steel and expansion joint allowances prevent expensive retrofits. On ground mounts, trench routing, combiner placement, and DC/AC cable voltage drop trade-offs impact both CAPEX and energy yield. You want an engineer who shows their math, not just in a spreadsheet but in the physical walk of the site plan.
Safety is design, not just labels
Good design reduces real hazards. That shows up in disconnect placement that avoids live-front work near pedestrian paths, in clear arc flash boundaries on switchboards, in thoughtful transformer placement that avoids acoustic and EMF complaints, and in cable routing that avoids tight bend radii and water ingress risks. A mature firm will use conservative assumptions for working spaces, respect manufacturer clearances, and specify equipment with realistic short lead times and tested certifications.
In the field, little details matter. I have seen projects save days in commissioning because the engineer added test points and temporary load taps that made acceptance testing straightforward. Conversely, I have seen dangerous improvisations when the design ignored service entrance accessibility and left crews guessing on energized work procedures.
SCADA, data, and the value of being boring
Modern inverters are powerful, but data systems can become a tangle: revenue meters, utility RTUs, inverter gateways, site controllers, weather stations, cellular modems or fiber, and cybersecurity policies that vary by owner and utility. A strong PV solar engineer will build an I/O list early, define naming conventions, allocate IP addresses, and specify time sync methods. They will map alarms to priorities so the O&M team does not drown in noise, and they will insist on realistic network diagrams that match how electricians will pull and label cables.
Boring is good here. Choose a solar electrical engineering company that prefers proven architectures, documents the network with clarity, and closes the loop with commissioning scripts. That discipline pays back every month for the life of the asset.
Cost is more than the fee
Engineering fees can look expensive in isolation, especially when a low bidder presents a lean package. But the right partner saves multiples of their fee by preventing rework, minimizing change orders, and compressing commissioning. Hidden costs often show up as utility resubmittals, AHJ re-review fees, stranded equipment from mismatched specs, unplanned panelboard or transformer upgrades because fault currents were miscalculated, or field labor spikes to correct inadequate raceway space.
When comparing proposals, align scope precisely. Does the fee include stamped drawings for permit, construction, and record sets? Are coordination studies, grounding studies, and relay settings in scope? Is support for utility witness testing included? How many RFI cycles are covered? Will they attend site walks and precon meetings? The cheapest fee with thin scope can be the most expensive choice by the end.
People you can reach, and how they work under pressure
Solar schedules are not gentle. Weather windows, crane rentals, interconnection outages, and PPA milestones pile up. You need a team that answers the phone and gives clear direction when a field condition deviates from the plan. Some firms push all communication through account managers who are polite but distant from the details. Others put the project engineer in regular calls with your superintendent and commissioning lead. The latter style often resolves issues before they become RFIs.
Watch for how a firm handles a mistake. On a recent warehouse project, an engineer missed a steel obstruction that interfered with a bus duct path. They owned the error, redesigned overnight to a split feeder solution, and issued a stamped bulletin within 24 hours. The fix cost a few thousand dollars in extra cable and time, but the project stayed on schedule. That responsiveness is worth more than a pristine marketing brochure.
Storage and hybrid systems raise the bar
If your project includes batteries, ask about prior BESS integrations with the inverter and EMS platforms you intend to use. Storage introduces layered controls: power setpoints, state-of-charge limits, islanding transitions, black start requirements, and fire safety interlocks. The electrical engineer must coordinate with mechanical and fire protection engineers on ventilation rates, gas detection, deflagration panels where needed, and emergency power-off logic that still preserves fire department access.
For microgrids and backup power, relay coordination expands beyond simple overcurrent to include transfer trip schemes, synch check logic, and closed-transition switching risks. Ask for examples of load shedding strategies they have implemented and how they tested them under realistic scenarios. A shop that has only done grid-following PV may struggle when your facility demands seamless transition to backup power.
Due diligence on vendors, not just drawings
A strong solar electrical engineering company acts as a check on vendor claims. Inverter datasheets look similar on the surface, yet fault current contribution profiles, reactive power range, and grid support functions vary. Combiner and re-combiner buses have thermal limits that are easy to exceed in hot climates if you chase low material costs. Transformer sound levels differ, and so do impedances that affect inrush and harmonic performance. Mature engineers carry libraries of lessons learned and steer you away from paper values that do not hold in the field.
If your project targets tax credits or incentives with domestic content or prevailing wage requirements, your engineer should understand how equipment selections affect compliance documentation. They do not replace your legal team, but they can simplify the path by specifying components with clear traceability and known certification paths.
A practical short list of selection criteria
Use the following quick filter to separate strong candidates from the rest:
- State-licensed PEs on staff who will stamp your drawings, with the Engineer of Record engaged from schematic design through commissioning. Demonstrated utility coordination, with named contacts and examples of approved interconnections in your utility territory or a similar one. Detailed, consistent drawing sets that include one-lines, three-lines where needed, grounding and bonding plans, conductor sizing calculations, voltage drop, short-circuit and arc flash studies, and protection settings. Clear scope that covers design support during construction, RFI responses with turnaround commitments, and on-site or remote support for witness tests and commissioning. References from projects of similar size and type, including at least one that had a complication and was resolved without major schedule slippage.
Keep the list short and verify with calls, not just PDFs. Two or three solid references will tell you more than a dozen glossy case studies.
Beware of the most common failure modes
Patterns repeat across projects. Expect these traps and ask how a potential partner addresses them.
The first trap is shallow interconnection analysis. Many firms rely on generic inverter settings and hope the utility accepts them. The better approach is to ask the utility early about feeder constraints, anti-islanding preferences, and whether they enforce specific IEEE 1547 ride-through profiles. A minor mismatch can trigger weeks of delay or a requirement to add external relays you did not budget.
Second, rooftop pathway and access conflicts. A design might meet NEC but miss local fire code expectations for ladder access, parapet height safety, or setback rules that differ by roof type. Ask for example plan sheets with AHJ redlines and how they resolved them.
Third, inadequate allowance for thermal expansion in long conduit runs, especially on rooftops and carports. Absent or poorly placed expansion fittings lead to cracked boxes and water ingress within the first summer. Good engineers specify supports, expansion joints, and sealing details suited to your climate.
Fourth, unrealistic as-built documentation. If the firm does not return for as-built verification or lacks a process to incorporate field changes into record drawings, you will pay for it in O&M. Require a documented as-built workflow tied to commissioning sign-off.
Fifth, cybersecurity overlooked on SCADA. Utilities increasingly require secure protocols, VPNs, or specific firewall rules for telemetry. If your engineer treats this as an afterthought, your permission to operate can stall for reasons that feel unrelated to the array.
When a design-build EPC is enough, and when to separate engineering
Design-build can be efficient for straightforward projects where the EPC has a capable internal engineering team. Communication lines are short, and constructability gets first-class treatment. It starts to break down when the EPC’s workload outpaces their engineering bandwidth or when the project includes novel elements like high-voltage interconnections, complex protection schemes, or BESS with strict fire code constraints.
If your project carries unusual risk, consider contracting directly with a solar electrical engineering company for at least the early design and interconnection studies. The EPC can then build from a stable foundation. Owners who do this often avoid scope creep and reduce change orders. It does not mean you need two fully separate teams in conflict. It means you anchor the project in a design that reflects your priorities and the utility’s requirements before procurement locks you into a path.
Contracts, deliverables, and what good looks like
Clarity in the contract saves time later. Define deliverables by phase: schematic design, 60 percent issue, permit set, construction set, and record set. Tie each to content, not just page counts. For example, at 60 percent, require updated load calculations, preliminary equipment schedules with naming, preliminary protection concepts, and draft utility one-line aligned to their template.
Set response times for RFIs and submittal reviews, with a tiered system for field-critical items. Require a commissioning support plan that lists tests, expected data points, pass/fail criteria, and who witnesses what. If the firm offers solar electrical engineering services that extend into O&M analytics and performance troubleshooting, consider adding a short post-COD support window. Early months often surface small configuration issues that benefit from the original engineer’s attention.
Reading drawing sets as a non-engineer
Owners and developers sometimes feel at the mercy of drawings. You do not need to be a PE to spot quality. Look at the one-line diagram first. Are major components clearly labeled with ratings, breaker sizes, and fault duties? Do feeders include conductor sizes, materials, and insulation types? Is grounding coherent, with a clear depiction of grounding electrode conductors, bonds, and equipment grounding paths? If it reads like a map where you can follow power from module to grid with no jumps, you likely have a careful engineer.
Then scan the general notes. Are assumptions documented? Are references to codes and utility standards current? Vague notes often signal rushed work. Finally, check sheet consistency. If panel schedules disagree with one-lines, field change orders are in your future.
Culture fit and long-term stewardship
Solar assets live 20 to 30 years. The engineer you choose today will influence your O&M burden a decade from now. Look for a firm that values maintainability. That shows up in spare part lists that make sense, in equipment placement that respects service clearances, and in documentation that stays useful after the construction trailers leave.
Ask how they archive project data and who owns the native design files. If you need to expand or modify the system five years down the road, those files save weeks. A cooperative attitude on this front is a strong signal of a partner who sees beyond the immediate fee.
A brief comparison framework to close the gap between proposals
When proposals land on your desk and look close, a structured side-by-side helps. The goal is not to overanalyze but to make differences explicit.
- Scope completeness: Do all proposals include studies, utility coordination, and commissioning support, or are you comparing apples and oranges? Team bios: Are the listed engineers the ones who will actually work on your project, with relevant experience, or are they generic company resumes? Schedule realism: Do the timelines include utility review durations and AHJ review windows that match your jurisdiction? Risk register: Has the firm identified project-specific risks and mitigation strategies in writing, or is risk left implicit? Communication plan: Will you get weekly check-ins with the project engineer, or only milestone updates?
A firm that engages on these points is more likely to manage the unforeseen gracefully.
Final thoughts from the field
The right solar electrical engineering company will reduce uncertainty, not just produce drawings. They will ask better questions, set clearer expectations with the utility and AHJ, and insist on a level of detail that makes construction predictable. It is tempting to chase low fees and optimistic durations. Resist that reflex. Take references seriously, calibrate scope carefully, and choose people who pick up the phone when the crane is in the air.
When you find that partner, nurture the relationship. Early notice of pipeline, honest feedback after closeout, and prompt payment terms help good engineers keep their best people on your work. Over time, the dividends show up in fewer surprises, smoother commissioning, and assets that perform like the pro forma, month after month.
Business Name: Exactus Energy
Address: 888 Dupont St Unit 208, Toronto, ON M9A 1B5
Phone number: +1 833-392-2887
What permits are needed to install solar panels?
Installing solar panels usually requires a building permit to confirm structural safety, an electrical permit to ensure code compliance, and utility approval for grid connection. In many cases, zoning reviews or fire code checks may also be required, especially for ground-mounted systems. Additional permits may apply if battery storage is included. The exact permits vary by city, state, or province, so checking with local authorities is essential.
Why do solar permits take so long?
Solar permits can take weeks or months because each authority having jurisdiction reviews plans for safety, code compliance, and utility coordination. Delays often come from backlogs at building departments, missing documents, or varying local requirements. Inconsistent processes between municipalities also slow things down. Having a complete and well-prepared application usually speeds up approvals.
What is a US solar permit?
A US solar permit is official authorization from a local building or electrical authority allowing the installation of a solar energy system. It confirms that the project meets national and local safety codes, zoning laws, and fire standards. The permit process typically includes plan reviews, inspections, and utility approval. Without this permit, the system cannot be legally connected or energized.
Is it hard to get out of a solar panel contract?
Exiting a solar panel contract can be challenging because agreements often lock customers into long-term financing, leases, or power purchase arrangements. Cancellation may involve penalties, repayment of incentives, or transferring the contract to a homebuyer. Some companies offer limited cancellation windows, but once installation begins, options are usually restricted. It’s important to review terms carefully before signing.
Are you allowed to install your own solar panels?
In many places, homeowners are legally allowed to install their own solar panels, but the work must meet electrical and building codes. Permits and inspections are still required, and some utilities mandate that a licensed installer handle grid connections. DIY installations can be risky if you’re not experienced in electrical work. Hiring a licensed professional ensures compliance and safety.
How much is a solar permit in California?
In California, state law caps residential solar permit fees at $500 for rooftop systems and $1,000 if battery storage is included. Commercial projects may have higher limits based on system size. Some cities charge less, and online permitting systems can reduce costs further. Always confirm fees with your local building department, since exact amounts vary by jurisdiction.
Exactus Energy has the business name "Exactus Energy". Exactus Energy has the address "888 Dupont St Unit 208, Toronto, ON M9A 1B5". Exactus Energy has the phone number "+1 833-392-2887". Exactus Energy has the website "https://www.exactusenergy.com/ ". Exactus Energy has the email [email protected]" ". Exactus Energy has business hours of Monday through Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm EST. Exactus Energy has business hours of Saturday 8:00am to 6:00pm EST. Exactus Energy provides the service of structural solar engineering. Exactus Energy provides the service of solar structural engineering. Exactus Energy provides the service of structural engineering. Exactus Energy provides the service of solar permitting service. Exactus Energy provides the service of solar permit services. Exactus Energy provides the service of solar permit service. Exactus Energy provides the service of solar plans. Exactus Energy provides the service of solar design and stamping. Exactus Energy provides the service of commercial solar engineering. Exactus Energy provides the solution of a solar permit package. A solar permit package is designed to simplify on-site operations and engineering. Exactus Energy performs site survey. Exactus Energy performs design and engineering. Exactus Energy delivers a stamped permit package. A stamped permit package is intended for AHJ approval. Exactus Energy serves 50 states in the United States. Exactus Energy serves 9 Canadian provinces. Exactus Energy specializes in solar design. Exactus Energy specializes in engineering for solar permitting. Exactus Energy has commercial solar projects as its target customers. Exactus Energy operates in the renewable energy industry. Exactus Energy operates in the solar engineering sector. Exactus Energy is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. "